Answer this question using these notes, including in-text citations with a good topic sentence and concluding sentence. question- what is the relationship between a person’s diet and the enviorment? (Hill, 2010) • Meat causes more emissions than all transportation. • Beef production requires 100 times more water than plants. • Twice compared to the 50s • Solution: weekday veg • Reduce consumption of red meat • Cutting 5 days a week 70% • Footprint smaller • Saving money • Healthier • Lose weight. (Reveal, 2012) • Livestock: emission, pollution • WWIl - Mid 1970s doubled • 3 burgers per week • 48 billion burgers every year • Hidden cost: • Cows take up 30% entire land. • Pollution • 1800 gallons of water to produce a pound of beef • Cows eat a lot • Cows create methane gas, more potent than CO2, which is more greenhouse gas. • Fertiliser creates algae blooms, taking up. • охуgen • The system is the problem. • Too much red meat causes heart disease, diabetes, and high blood pressure • What can we do? • Cutting 1 burger per week • No meat or cheese per week • Grass-fed beef (Bryce, 2014) • Solution: eating bugs • 2 billion people in the tropics • Culturally acceptable; significant population • Healthy • A solution to food insecure • More mineral iron than beef • Less environmental • Less water, space, and food • Inexpensive Sustainable structure of the summary -topic sentence -negative impact of beef consumption to the environment -3 solutions -why these solution -concluding sentence

The relationship between a person's diet and the environment is significant, particularly when it comes to the consumption of beef. Studies have shown that meat production, especially beef, causes more emissions than all transportation (Hill, 2010). Additionally, beef production requires 100 times more water than plant-based alternatives (Hill, 2010). This negative impact on the environment can be mitigated through various solutions. One solution is adopting a "weekday veg" approach, which involves reducing the consumption of red meat and cutting it out for five days a week, resulting in a 70% reduction in environmental footprint (Hill, 2010). This not only helps save money but also promotes a healthier lifestyle and weight loss (Hill, 2010). Another solution is reducing the consumption of burgers, as cows take up 30% of the entire land and their production contributes to pollution and the release of methane gas, a potent greenhouse gas (Reveal, 2012). Cutting just one burger per week or going meat and cheese-free for a week can make a significant difference (Reveal, 2012). Alternatively, an unconventional solution is the consumption of bugs, which is culturally acceptable in many tropical regions and provides a sustainable and environmentally friendly source of nutrition (Bryce, 2014). Bugs are healthy, require less water, space, and food compared to traditional livestock, and are an inexpensive and sustainable solution to food insecurity (Bryce, 2014). In conclusion, the relationship between a person's diet and the environment is evident, with beef consumption having a particularly negative impact. However, through solutions such as reducing red meat consumption, cutting back on burgers, or exploring alternative protein sources like bugs, individuals can make a positive change for the environment.